Will Netanyahu the “defeated” attack Iran?

Why is the Hebrew media increasing its leaks regarding the failure of the second round of negotiations in Geneva?

If the statements made yesterday by some American and Iranian officials who participated in the second round of negotiations at the Omani embassy in Geneva are correct and confirm tangible progress, which appears unlikely given the short duration of the negotiations, the chances of a military confrontation have increased. The underlying American purpose is to save time while waiting for full military mobilisation in the surrounding oceans or near Iran (the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean, and American military bases in neighbouring countries such as Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, and Bahrain).

The Israeli occupation state is attempting to sabotage the negotiations and hasten the war by imposing impossible conditions, such as halting enrichment, transferring highly or low-enriched uranium outside of Iran, reducing the number and range of ballistic missiles, and ceasing financial and military support to resistance factions. All of this is part of the pressure on President Trump to increase the aggression.

“Israel” will be the biggest loser if an American-Iranian agreement is reached, as it would mean lifting the blockade and the associated economic sanctions, resulting in hundreds of billions of dollars flowing into the Iranian treasury from the lifting of all oil export restrictions and its return to global markets with complete freedom. This would imply economic prosperity and financial wealth following a 47-year embargo, the expansion of public services for the people, and, most crucially, the modernisation of the Iranian military industry’s numbers, capacities, and equipment. Reaching an American-Iranian agreement would ensure the survival of the Islamic regime, a change Trump has threatened to bring about. He has also threatened to assassinate the Supreme Leader and change the leadership in Tehran. The lifting of the blockade and economic sanctions, along with the influx of hundreds of billions into the Iranian treasury, would significantly disadvantage “Israel”. Such an outcome means economic prosperity and financial wealth following a 47-year embargo, the expansion of public services for the people, and, most crucially, continued modernisation of the Iranian military industry’s numbers, capabilities, and equipment. Most importantly, it means the Islamic regime’s survival, which Trump has often threatened to topple, the Supreme Leader’s murder, and Tehran’s leadership change.

The Iranian steadfastness in adhering to all red lines, and the insistence in every round of negotiations, whether the old ones in Vienna that lasted a year and a half or the newer ones in Muscat, the capital of Oman, on the right to enrichment, and isolating the issue of ballistic missiles as an internal Iranian matter that constitutes the essence of national sovereignty – this steadfastness, reinforced by the lack of fear from American military threats and the mobilisation

The prolongation of negotiations, the multiplication of rounds, and the failure to reach an agreement that includes full compliance with Israeli conditions—namely, the dismantling of Iran’s military and nuclear fangs and its missile and drone claws, stopping financial and military support for resistance factions, and lifting the siege—ultimately led to the thwarting of all Israeli hegemony plans, from the suppression of the principle of resistance to the acceleration

It is worth noting that resistance forces are rapidly recuperating and restoring military and human capabilities, particularly in Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq, as well as the Gaza Strip. The Israeli airstrikes and assassinations that have continued for over a year since the ceasefire in Lebanon, along with accompanying American and Arab pressures, have failed to disarm Hezbollah, destroy the land and naval missile capabilities of the Ansar Allah movement in Yemen, or break the strong alliance ties of most Iraqi resistance factions, whether military or political, with their Iranian neighbours.

The Israeli army boasted yesterday about its success, claiming that after more than two years of slaughter, famine, and ethnic cleansing, it has destroyed only 150 of the Gaza Strip’s 500 tunnels. What a victory, what resistance, and what incredible minds, not only in building these tunnels that require cement, iron, digging, and soil, which Israeli intelligence, boasting about its precision and superiority, failed to detect, but also in the Al-Qassam Brigades’ steadfastness and in their cadres holding elections to choose new leadership for their institutions and political offices in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and abroad. *** Military manoeuvres with Russia in the Strait of Hormuz and the Arabian Sea support Iran’s commitment to ballistic missile and drone programmes. The main objectives are to close the Strait to 22 million barrels per day flowing to global markets and to confront aircraft carriers and warships in the event of a war. Such actions could raise the price of a barrel between $00 and $500, depending on the situation.

The Iranian response focused on the “sanctity” of ballistic missile programmes and drones, as well as military manoeuvres with Russia in the Strait of Hormuz and in the Arabian Sea. The main goals were to close the strait, preventing 22 million barrels per day from entering global markets, and to confront aircraft carriers and warships in the event of a war, potentially raising the price of a barrel between 00 and

Imam Sayyid Ali Khamenei, the ultimate authority on peace and war, used a phrase that has entered the naval military lexicon in the broadest sense, and its practical translation could determine the outcomes of any upcoming war, when he said, “Yes, aircraft carriers are a formidable military force, but what is more dangerous are Iranian missiles that will destroy them and sink them to the bottom of the sea.”

Mr Khamenei says this not as a threat to frighten, as Trump frequently does these days, but because he is fully aware of his country’s military capabilities and is prepared to respond to any aggression. Perhaps what happened in the June war last year, the 12-day war, is one of the compelling pieces of evidence that confirms this statement, and the surprises in the next war, possibly imminent, will be even greater.

They are retreating from their threats and plans to wage a long-term war, after it was supposed to be a quick, limited strike. However, this is what the Revolutionary Guard and Iranian army officials aspire to when they declare that any invasion will escalate into a regional conflict. The longer the war lasts, the greater the losses will be, as it will be a war of attrition. This contradicts the new doctrine of the American armies and their upcoming wars, which the Pentagon established and announced last month: a short, quick, clean war to avoid losses and reduce their scale.

Netanyahu and his group will end America and its superpower status.

Will Netanyahu the “defeated” attack Iran?