Why do most Arab channels “celebrate” the Nazi Israeli democracy?
Why do we warn Arab MPs about falling into this trap and making concessions at the wrong time? There is no choice between the terrible and the worse; they are all Zionists and terrorists, two sides of the same terrorist coin
Those who follow most Arab television stations these days and their focus on what is called “Israeli democracy” and the results of its elections, as well as the power struggle between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the opposition bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot, are surprised and shocked by this “marketing” of this fascist democracy, the lack of differences between the two competing blocs, and the simultaneous neglect of a key fact: that both Netanyahu and Eisenkot are not
All indications point to Israeli President Isaac Herzog appointing “opposition” leader Gadi Eisenkot to head the new Israeli government tomorrow, Sunday, after his coalition obtained 67 endorsements from MPs, including 19 Arab deputies, sadly. Not a single deputy spoke out against this horrible marketing of a “Nazi democracy” that supports genocide and ethnic cleansing, even though the majority of the world’s honourable forces oppose them and their “state” in the east, west, north, and south.
Eizenkot declared yesterday that he is working on building a national emergency administration in a message to Israelis via “Platform X,” focused solely on the four Zionist parties seeking change and reform. This is based on some conditions and principles for joining, the most notable of which are adherence to the values stated in the Israeli Declaration of Independence, military or civil service, expanding and strengthening the army, affirming the Hamas movement’s “terrorism,” and working to dismantle its military capabilities and ruling authority.
This statement from incoming Prime Minister Eizenkot, who is expected to be tasked with forming the government tomorrow, confirms the exploitation and simultaneous exclusion of the Arab voice, as well as the imposition of harsh and humiliating conditions for including any Arab deputy in the new government, from the deputies of the two Arab blocs that contested these elections, united in supporting him and recommending his appointment in their meeting with the Israeli president. This means that the Arab political voice is “influential” in the calculation of seats and their numbers but “restricted” or “forbidden” in decision-making, effectively a “false witness.”
To reiterate, Eizenkot was the commander of the Israeli army and a member of Netanyahu’s mini-war cabinet, which is still in place today. This cabinet has engaged in genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Gaza Strip, voted in the Knesset to annex the West Bank, authorized the arming of settlers, and incited them to use guns to kill our people in the West Bank. Eizenkot did not hesitate to publish a statement a few days ago, categorically rejecting any claim against the “State of Israel” and its army of genocide and never abandoning the principle of the Jewish state and the Zionist character.
The refusal of many of our people in the 1948-occupied Palestinian territories, specifically in Israeli elections for 77 years, to recognize Israel as a “state” is not a negative stance but rather the pinnacle of nationalism, one of the most visible forms of resistance, dignity, and political awareness. However, advocating this fascist democracy in its current form is not “rational” or “far-sighted,” but rather the height of surrender.
Netanyahu and Eizenkot are two sides of the same Zionist terrorist coin, and we should not distinguish between them under the guise of selecting between the terrible and the worst. We are not obligated to make this decision, especially given the growing global condemnation of this terrorist entity. At a time when voters in a country like America, the protector and supporter of the Zionist terrorist entity, dealt a decisive blow to Trump and his Zionist government, represented by the loss of his Republican Party’s majority in the “Congress,” with its two chambers, the House of Representatives and the Senate, “as if we were going on a pilgrimage while people were returning.”
Supporting and embracing Eizenkot and his Zionist terrorist alliance is a hasty and nearsighted move, an insult to the tradition of resistance and the blood of martyrs across all of Palestine, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and occupied and stubborn communities that reject Zionist settlement. Furthermore, it is “free” and supports the normalization program and the “Abraham Accords.” Our adversary is not only Netanyahu, but every Zionist who occupies our land strives to destroy our national identity and intends to exterminate our people.
Finally, we would like to express our gratitude and respect to our people in the 1948 occupied Palestinian territories, who have steadfastly remained on their land, never hesitated to resist the occupation, preserve their identity, and offer martyrs, enduring all forms of oppression and suffering. Yes, they and we are both more familiar with Mecca’s routes. The Zionists will never succeed in isolating us from one another because the motherland is one, the blood is one, the pain is one, and the coming victory, God willing, will benefit all.
https://www.raialyoum.com/why-do-most-arab-channels-celebrate-the-nazi-israeli-democracy/
TheAltWorld
0 thoughts on “Why do most Arab channels “celebrate” the Nazi Israeli democracy?”