A revolutionary spirit has entered the Democrat Party which has a new constituency composed of LGBT and multiculturalism
GEOFOR: What happened to Republican hopes in the election? Why was the outcome so different from expectations?
Dr. Roberts: Americans, not all of them but most, are too proud of their country and too protective of its reputation as “the world’s best democracy” to admit it, but they have just experienced another stolen election. All the telltale signs are there–just as they are for the 2020 presidential election that was stolen from President Trump. Ballot count delays while Democrats round up sufficient fraudulent ballots to offset the Republican’s victory. Sudden upward spikes of 100,000 votes in one moment of time to push a Democrat candidate on a losing path ahead of the Republican. It is not possible for that number of ballots to be counted in such a short time period or that they would all be for one candidate alone. I know of no Republican candidate winning by a sudden upward spike in votes. This is a phenomenon exclusive to Democrats. A person might think that it would strike people as curious that only Democrats win by sudden upward vote spikes and ask questions, but no such question arises. To my knowledge, no election official has ever produced the names of the vast numbers of Democrats who somehow voted all at once in a short time for the Democrat candidate.
Fox TV’s Tucker Carlson pointed out one way the Democrats stole the Arizona election. The Democrats arranged for the voting machines to fail in voting precincts known as Republican majority. Those unable to vote, or some of them, were given a ballot to be put in a box when completed to be counted later. Next the Democrats announced that these uncounted ballots were “accidentally” mixed with already counted ballots and there was no way to tell them apart. This is one-way Republican votes were flushed out of the vote counting system.
Some insouciant people say, “there has always been vote fraud, there is nothing new to see here.” What these unbothered people overlook is that never before the 2020 presidential election and the 2022 midterm election has vote fraud been organized on a national basis and across state lines. Past instances of election theft were local phenomena.
Other people say that Republicans steal votes also and point to George W. Bush’s victory in Florida over Al Gore. But the Florida count was a procedural issue decided by the US Supreme Court, not by voting machines, stuffed ballot boxes, or other means. The evidence was that it was Democrats in Brevard County who were trying to steal the election for Al Gore.
My conclusion that the last two elections were organized thefts by Democrats is not partisan. My conclusion rests in analysis. There is a big new difference between Republicans and Democrats. We can no longer view the parties as liberal vs. conservative, the working class against Wall Street and the large corporations. The working class, formerly a protectorate of the Democrats, is today disavowed as “Trump Deplorables.” A revolutionary spirit has entered the Democrat Party which has a new constituency composed of LGBT, multiculturalism, and Woke censors who claim the power to regulate speech and insure its compliance with their ideology.
A generation or two of anti-Western, anti-white propaganda in our Universities – “Western Civ Has to go,” for example, has filtered down into the primary public school system. Transgender theory is used to confuse children about their natural gender and to give children the idea that gender is something chosen, not imposed by nature or birth. Critical race theory is used to inculcate guilt in white kids and infuse them with the acceptance that a merit-based society must be abandoned in the interest of advancement of the racially oppressed. The New York Times supports this indoctrination with its 1619 Project which teaches that the United States is based in racism and white supremacy. “Diversity” and “multiculturalism” are used to break down and destroy the inculcation of youth into Western civilization. By transforming a once homogenous country into a Tower of Babel, a social revolution is effected. Parents lose control over their children to school boards and Child Protective Services. Democrats are currently trying to criminalize parental opposition to sex change operations of their children as “child abuse.” Parents who object to public schools supported by their property taxes teaching their kids that the kids and parents are racists are ejected from school board meetings and in some cases threatened with investigation. If the parents work for companies with Woke executives, they might be fired. Just as revolutionary ideas have filtered down from universities into public schools via university graduates, the same has happened to corporations, media, and medical practice.
The revolution has been gradual and consequently was regarded as the ramblings of a few nutcases. This left the revolution largely unopposed and contributed to its success.
Another feature of the Democrats’ revolution is open borders that are flooding the US population with non-whites, essentially turning the US into a non-white country, thereby dispensing with the “reactionary values of Western civilization.” At the hands of Democrats, white Americans are facing civilizational genocide.
The first nationally organized theft of an election was the 2020 presidential election. It met with much opposition. Numerous independent experts analyzed the data and proved conclusively that the election was stolen. Some Republicans made national efforts to present the evidence to media and the public. But nothing came of their efforts. The official narrative was immediately established that “there is no evidence of a stolen election.” Some of those who had made an issue of the theft were branded “enemies of democracy” and threatened with investigations and arrests. No one asked if the elections were honest why such an intense effort to silence skeptics? When skeptical Republicans finally got an opportunity to present evidence of electoral fraud prior to the vote certifying Biden’s “victory,” the Democrats orchestrated an “insurrection,” and Rino Republicans like Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell helped to deep-six the presentation of evidence. As the US has a propaganda ministry instead of a media, few Americans know that the reason for the orchestrated “insurrection” was to block the presentation of the evidence of electoral fraud to Congress prior to the certification of Biden’s win.
There is a huge difference between Democrats and Republicans, and it is very different from what people think. Democrats have become a party with a revolutionary agenda while Republicans still operate in the old order that Democrats are in the process of overthrowing. For those with revolutionary fervor, power is much more important than democracy or a fair vote. This leaves Republicans much disadvantaged as their lack of a revolutionary agenda leaves them without determination to seize power at all cost. Yes, they want power, but not for revolutionary purposes. For revolutionaries, there are no constraints on the grasp for power.
The Republican response to the stolen 2022 election is almost nonexistent. Former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich asked, “What’s going on?” But he doesn’t answer “a stolen election.” He simply says that he was wrong in expecting, like all other analysts, a “red wave.” He questions not the vote spikes, delayed vote counts, and misplaced or lost ballots. Instead, he questions the models that projected on the basis of past experience the likely election outcome: “It makes me challenge every model I’m aware of, and realize that I have to really stop and spend a good bit of time thinking and trying to put it all together.”
Gingrich wonders how it is possible that Republicans got 5 or 6 million more votes in last Tuesday’s election than in the prior election and it only resulted in a small difference in result. In other words, he hints that something is fishy, but knows he cannot say it.
Rino Republicans were quick to blame the Republicans’ disappointing outcome on Trump. Other Republicans, such as Senator Josh Hawley (R, Mo.), blame the Republicans for caving in on issues instead of fighting and says, “The old party is dead. Time to bury it. Build something new.” This is sort of what President Trump was trying to do by trying to reinvigorate the American way, and the Establishment ejected him and is determined that he not return to politics. As Trump discovered, the problem of restoration or renewal is impossible politically when all major institutions–media, education, corporate, Wall Street, CIA, FBI, Department of Justice even when they are your own appointees are opposed to it.
How can the Republican Party survive as an independent force when the Department of Justice and FBI are politicized weapons in the hands of Democrats, when corporate America, supposedly “big business behind Republicans” is in the hands of Woke executives, when the print and TV media serve as a Ministry of Truth & Propaganda for Democrats, when insouciant Americans have little comprehension of what is happening before their eyes and little time, energy, and inclination to find out?
Conservative Kevin MacDonald blames a lack of white awakening. White Americans, despite the clear fact that the Democrats are out to get them with critical race theory and Identity Politics still vote for the Democrats who are at work displacing white civilization with “diversity” and “multiculturalism.”
In other words, blame the victims and not the Democrats who stole the election.
The vote in large Democrat controlled cities is in the hands of Democrats who control the process and vote counting. There is no way for Republicans to monitor the voting. Authority is in the hands of local Democrats, not in the hands of Republican poll watchers. Whatever objections the poll watchers make will be dismissed by the presstitutes as “misinformation.”
To bring in an outside authority, the elections would have to be federalized which would mean over-riding the Constitution, which can’t stand any more over-riding and still exist. Moreover, federalizing the elections would simply put them more firmly in the hands of Democrats and their operatives in the FBI, DOJ, and federal bureaucracy.
What must be understood is that a political party with a revolutionary agenda is not constrained by rules. It is just as nonsensical for Republicans to expect revolutionary Democrats to abide by rules as it for the Kremlin to expect the same from Washington. When you continually expect an opponent to abide by rules who never does, you are continually surprised and taken advantage of.
For Republicans it might be too late to come to this realization. I doubt Republicans will ever be permitted to return to power. Two successfully stolen elections in a row have established a new election paradigm that is immune to fraud accusations.
As for the Kremlin, it remains to be seen if Putin has waited too long to bring the war in Ukraine to a close that is to Russia’s advantage. The Kremlin’s delay in bringing the war to a victorious conclusion has allowed the war to widen to such an extent that it is difficult for the West to step back from the conflict and disengage.
I fear that America is on two deadly paths. One leads to a one party state. The other leads to nuclear war.
This is what happens when people do not pay attention.
GEOFOR: Was there a Trump Insurrection?
Dr. Roberts: On October 11, FBI Special Agent Justin Eller testified at the seditious conspiracy trial of four Oath Keepers in federal court. An attorney for the defense asked Eller if in the Oath Keepers’ communications that he reviewed there was any indication that the Oath Keepers intended to storm the Capitol or stop the certification of the stolen presidential election. He answered “no” to both questions.
In other words, the FBI and the federal prosecutor had no evidence in support of the charges against the Oath Keepers who were on trial.
Today this is commonplace in America.
Before we go further, let us establish the identity of Oath Keepers. According to the whore media they are far rightwing white supremacists who are a threat to American democracy. But in actual fact they seem to be for the most part military veterans who swore the oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States. As the Oath Keepers were formed for that purpose, why, if they are Oath Keepers, would they violate their oath by conspiring against the United States?
The Democrats know, as does the whore media, that the Democrats stole the last presidential election. The presstitute mantra that “there is no evidence of a stolen election” is demonstrably false from the hard evidence and its presentation by many independent experts. But as the presstitutes say it is not so, it is not so.
People do not know because the whore media have not told them that prior to the vote certification that was to be held on January 6, dissenting Republicans had an opportunity to present evidence that the vote was fraudulent. The Democrats used the “insurrection” that they orchestrated with federal agents to prevent the presentation of the evidence of electoral fraud.
This suited Rino Republicans such as Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, who, himself being a member of the Washington Establishment, was both threatened and outraged by Trump’s assault on the Washington Establishment. Rino McConnell was instrumental in using the orchestrated “insurrection” to break up the vote certification before the evidence of fraud could be presented.
If Oath Keepers are aligned with Trump against the Establishment, which is the case, why would they act to prevent the presentation of the evidence that the election was stolen? It makes no sense. In other words, the Oath Keepers had no motive for the behavior for which they are on trial.
As the joint party Establishment and its media whores control the explanations, few Americans are aware that the allegedly vote certification session that Oath Keepers are accused of disrupting was also a certification to determine whether the election was fraudulent. It was the presentation of evidence of electoral fraud that was blocked by using the cover of a “Trump Insurrection.”
An insurrection needs insurrectionists. The Democrats had none to put on trial except the federal agents at the Capitol who tried to incite incidents while President Trump addressed the rally at the Washington Monument a mile or more away. How could there be an insurrection at the Capitol when the Trump supporters were attending a rally at the Washington Monument?
The whore media, of course, never asked this question. And neither did federal prosecutors prosecuting innocent people.
Where did the Democrats get the needed “insurrectionists”?
They got them from social media, cell phone, and email providers who turned over to the FBI social media messages and emails that indicated who attended the Trump rally. Americans who attended the rally were designated “potential insurrectionists.” Those who filtered down to the Capitol became the “insurrectionists.” The “Trump Insurrection” was the first unarmed insurrection in history.
According to media reports there are 600 “Trump insurrectionists” serving prison sentences. The worse offense seems to have been to take your photo sitting in Nancy Pelosi’s chair and posting it on social media, clearly a non-intelligent thing to do, but hardly an indication of insurrection.
Some of the imprisoned insurrectionists copped a plea, so the Democrats use these “confessions” as proof that there was a Trump insurrection. But in America today all sorts of people cop a plea, both the innocent and the guilty. The reason is that defending oneself is extremely expensive and fraught with high risk. Few defendants have the financial means or toleration of risk to face a jury trial. In times past juries were protective of defendants; today juries are wrapped around the prosecutors’s finger.
Those without resources are dependent on government subsidized public defenders. Public defenders who defend their clients are not assigned clients by the system as they waste prosecutors and judges’ time in jury trials when the system wants cases quickly disposed of with plea bargains. The incentive of public defendants is to encourage their clients to cop a plea.
Defense attorneys’ convincing argument to their clients is that if you demand a jury trial, you face these problems that your attorney can do nothing about. First, you make problems for the prosecutor, whose career and political aspirations depend on his conviction rate. Trials take time, during which the prosecutor could have achieved numerous plea bargain convictions, thus boosting his all important conviction tally. The prosecutor can respond to your refusal to cop a plea by enlarging the criminal accusations against you. Prosecutors have the ability to hire people to testify falsely against you. If the prosecutor wants you as an addition to his conviction rate, I cannot help you. Let me make a plea for you that will get you off lightly compared to the sentence you will get if you go to trial. Your innocence aside, you are going to jail regardless. The only question is for how long. I can shorten your imprisonment if you cooperate with me.
This is the way American “justice” works. It works the same way for rich and poor. The same thing happened to billionaire Michael Milken, to billionaire Leona Helmsley, and to centi-millionaire Martha Stewart. They were all falsely accused, they all had the best and most prestigious attorneys, and they were all convicted and went to prison, Milken with a plea bargain and Helmsley with a trial. And their prosecutor, Rudy Giuliana, used their high-profile convictions to become Mayor of New York.
Second, protesting your innocence you make problems for the judge whose docket is already full and crowded. You are making the judge’s life stressful by making him have a trial that might take a week or longer while his docket builds.
Third, you have close to zero chance with a jury. Juries composed of brainwashed Americans who see themselves threatened by crime are predisposed, unless black, to believe the prosecutor, and if the defendant is white, the blacks on the jury are all predisposed to convicting him for being a racist. It would be interesting to know how many white defendants have been found innocent by black jurors.
In short, a jury trial angers prosecutor, judge, and your defense counsel who wants to collect his fee and move on to to his next fee by having you cooperate with the system. Plea bargains are so prevalent that according to the US Department of Justice, 96% of felony cases are resolved by plea bargains.
The plea bargain that the defendant has to make does not have to have anything whatsoever to do with the charges that are the basis for his indictment. He can be accused of A and confess to B. All the prosecutor and judge need in order to avoid a time-consuming trial is an admission to something. Some years ago I read that most people in prison are there on charges that are not in their original indictment. They were in prison on plea bargains that provided shorter sentences in exchange for admitting to offenses that were not even charged in the original indictments.
In the Unites States “justice” is a weapon to discipline and to punish people who are out of step with official narratives. The Oath Keepers are out of step, because they point to the erosion of the US Constitution, still a governing, though much weakened, document.
In the United States, the British Isles, and Europe the presstitutes can destroy anyone–even a President of the United States–by printing lies about him. Look at what has happened to Trump. Look at what has happened to Julian Assange. Look at what has happened to the medical scientists and doctors who were on the side of the people instead of on the side of Big Pharma and its marketing agents such as Fauci, Biden, NIH, CDC, FDA.
In the Western world today, nothing is based on truth. Facts are inconvenient for the ruling elites and are discarded in George Orwell’s 1984 Memory Hole.
The failure of the American people to correct the situation on November 8 and the success the Democrats have had in stealing another election tells us that the only future Americans and the entire Western world face is tyranny.
In America it is only patriots who are persecuted. Voters in Pennsylvania, if the election was not stolen, actually elected a US Senator who wants to release the criminals from prison. It is not the innocents wrongly convicted that he wants to release, it is the real criminals who rob, rape, and murder.
Before America lost its way, who would ever have thought that Americans would elect a US Senator who believes that it is robbers, rapists, and murderers who are abused and not their victims.
Sodom and Gomorrah was once regarded as the epitome of evil, but not today. Sodom and Gomorrah pales in comparison to the evil that rules the West today.
And the Russians still place hopes in “negotiations” with the Evil Empire. How can such a self-deceived people as Russians survive?
GEOFOR: Is the US too involved in Ukraine to disengage?
Dr. Roberts: The Pentagon has appointed a Lt. General (3 stars) Terry Wolff to head a new Army headquarters in Germany with a staff of 300 US military members to coordinate security assistance for Ukraine.
Gen. Wolff is a graduate of the US Army Ranger School, a former officer of an armored division, and former director of Strategic Plans and Policy, Joint Chiefs of Staff. This is not the kind of officer that is given inventory assignments.
As previously reported, Washington already has a division of troops deployed, not training, on Ukraine’s border and uniformed personnel in Ukraine ostensibly to prevent Ukraine from selling the weapons supplied by the West in black markets. Is “security assistance” a cover story for setting up a War Command Staff for the purpose of waging war in Ukraine against Russia?
If it is a subterfuge, it is one similar to those used to get the US involved in the Vietnam War.
Putin might be on the point of learning that his “limited operation” has left him with two choices: conclude a face-saving truce with Ukraine, if permitted, or find himself at war with the United States.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin is trying to revive Russian financial integration with the West, having learned nothing from the sanctions. Russia wants financial reconnection to the SWIFT payments system in order to be paid for food and fertilizer shipments. In other words, the Kremlin wants to bail out Washington from the responsibility for the hardships Washington’s sanctions policy is imposing, not on Russia, but on countries where hunger is a threat. Again, we have the Kremlin protecting her enemies as in Ukraine. The Kremlin certainly behaves strangely for a country at war.
I hope Putin doesn’t think he is going to earn brownie points in Washington.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of The Alternative World.