Censorship Is Being Used to Institutionalize Disinformation and to Discredit Reliable Information: The Case of Naomi Wolf
Naomi Wolf, feminist and liberal Democrat icon, has been censored and deplatformed by Twitter and Youtube. Ms. Wolf’s sin is that she “raised questions regarding the COVID-19 vaccine side effects, the constitutionality of lockdowns, and the candor of Anthony Fauci, head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).”
Social, print, and TV media prohibit any questioning of the establishment’s Covid narrative. Not even famous scientists with pockets full of proof are allowed to share their concerns.
Wolf is discovering that being a leading-light Democrat is no license for telling the truth. The social media nazis next sicced the presstitutes on her. The lying scum presstitutes ran stories that she was an “antivaxer,” a new sin that has been moved to the top just below “systemic racist,” and she was accused of posting vaccine misinformation. These charges were false as is everything in the presstitute media.
Presstitute media for which she has written for years ran stories against her without bothering to ask her side of the story. Wolf’s fate is a perfect example of a leading characteristic of our time: the replacement of authority figures by nonentities.
Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, and independent thinkers have similarly been witch-haunted for years. On the Internet comment sections are used to attack writers, reporters, and experts who depart from the official narratives. An operative writes a nasty lie in a comment section, and it is then spread into social media. Then trolls take it to Wikipedia, and the lie becomes part of the attacked person’s biography.
The same thing happens to books. Trolls use Amazon book reviews to drive away readers. An example is the book, The Most Dangerous Book Ever Published: Deadly Deception Exposed, edited by Soren Roest Korsgaard. The book is a collection of essays by Korsgaard, James Corbett, Gideon Polya, myself, and several others. A reviewer—a person no one has ever heard of—sought to discredit the book by writing that an essay by Polya, who is Jewish, “is blatant anti-semitism.” I have never had a Youtube account, but the troll writes that he used to follow me on Youtube. He accuses me of being a “member in good standing of the KKK” and alleges that I am guilty of writing “an apologia for Adolf Hitler.”
Ad hominem attacks devoid of fact have crowded out of public debate evidence-based analysis. Emotional leftists assign moral positions to arguments according to the left’s beliefs. Truth for them is emotion-based, not evidence-based. This is why total dumbshits at Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and Google have no qualms about censoring distinguished independent scientists. Suppressing the truth, or, if you like, dissent, has become the function of social, print, TV media, book reviewers, and commentators on Internet web sites.
Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger, agrees that Wikipedia has become a weapon wielded by the left and Zionists for the suppression of their critics. Sanger wrote, “Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree. Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy.”
If you want to know the truth, ignore those praised by the establishment and seek out those who are defamed. The Most Dangerous Book Ever Published is certainly regarded as dangerous by the establishment. That is all the proof that you need that the book is reliable.