As the Democratic Party Hates “Trump Deplorables,” How Can It Represent White People?
The Democrats are toast because they are incapable of producing a leader and are the politicians of divisive Identity Politics. The party’s ideology is anti-white and anti-male.
The party is also ensnared in Biden’s corruption. The Obama regime used Ukraine as a money laundering operation. Billions of US taxpayers’ money flowed to Ukraine and most then flowed back to Democrats like Biden and Son. The Clintons perfected this kind of scheme and accumulated $1,500 million in their “foundation” and $120 million in their private pockets. Tell me, from where did a poor boy from Arkansas and a second-rate lawyer get this amount of money?
The utterly corrupt Democrats have spent the entirety of Trump’s first term in CIA/FBI orchestrated coups—Russiagate and Impeachgate–for which they never could produce a gram of evidence. The US media is so corrupt and so devoid of integrity that the Democrats could get away with this with the media. But not with the American people, a growing majority of which trusts neither Democrats nor the lying corrupt media, CNN least of all.
This doesn’t mean the Republicans are any good. I criticize Trump all the time and have pointed out real reasons for impeaching him, but these reasons impose on Democrats’ corrupt interests and relationships and are ignored. Trump will win a second term because he is not perceived, as Democrats are perceived, as anti-white, and whites are still a voting majority despite Democrats’ efforts to reduce white Americans to a minority that can be democratically persecuted. Indeed, many whites already feel this way. They cannot say anything, intentionally or not, that “offends” a preferred minority protected by “hate speech” and “hate crimes,” protections denied to white Americans. Yet white Americans have to endure 24/7 slander that they are racists, white supremacists, misogynists, homophobic, anti-semite and whatever the term is for not caring for the “transgendered.”
Trump also speaks for the working class dismissed by Democrats as the “Trump Deplorables.” It is the working class that has paid for “globalism” and trade deals by having their jobs given to foreigners. The way America is ruled, it benefits the One Percent with crumbs spilling down to the top 10 percent. No one else benefits. Trump is a multi-billionaire who aligned with working Americans. That’s how he got elected. I remember driving through working class neighborhoods and seeing only Trump signs. That’s when I knew he would be elected. The Democrats have abandoned the working class and the poor for Wall Street money. Bill Clinton and Hillary showed them the way.
During Trump’s entire term he has had to spend his energy resisting the orchestrated attacks designed to remove him from office. It seems clear that this is perceived by those Americans who have been seriously harmed by globalism, jobs offshoring, unlimited immigration legal as well as illegal, wars, and racial and gender quotas. The obvious link between the Democrats and the military/security complex in the attack on Trump has destroyed the image of the Democratic Party. The Democrats are now a party of war.
This leaves the Democrats as a party that does not in any way represent working Americans. One of the Democrat candidates for the presidential nomination is a capitalist who has more billions than Trump. The Democrats are determined to prevent “socialist” Bernie Sanders from getting the presidential nomination because he might do something for the working class.
A serious question remains. As the military/security complex despite the efforts of CIA director John Brennon, the efforts of FBI director Comey, the efforts of the Obama Justice (sic) Department, and the presstitutes failed to assassinate Trump with words, will bullets be next?
America is a destroyed country. America’s schools and universities teach disrespect if not hatred of white people and heterosexual males. The epithets are driven in year after year–rapists, racists, slavers, misogynists. This anti-male propaganda shows up even in corporate ads such as Gillette’s infamous putdown of men.
The impact of such a demeaning diet on young white males is devastating. Some seek refuge by becoming feminized and supportive of the attack on their race and gender. NPR is full of such males as are American universities. Parents of white males in elementary schools find that the feminized teachers have no interest in the academic success of their sons. Little is done to help them; much to demoralize them.
Other young white males seek refuge in suicide. On June 18, 2019, the Los Angeles Times reported that “The rate at which young Americans took their own lives reached a high-water mark in 2017, driven by a sharp rise in suicides among older teenage boys . . . Suicide is now thought to be the second leading cause of death for Americans between 10 and 34.” https://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-suicide-rates-rising-teens-young-adults-20190618-story.html The Journal of the American Medical Association reported that for the age group 14-24 the suicide rate of males is four times higher than that of females.
In America, the role of men and the respect they once had as providers and protectors has been stripped away. Today senior white male professors are upbraided by deans and sensitivity officers and sometimes ordered to sensitivity training because they used the words “girls” in class.
At Cambridge University, white professors and administrators have assigned to them a person of color to monitor their speech, reading list, lectures, and attitude in order to guarantee that no literary expression and fact of history, law, physics or biology “offends” a protected minority.
That a faculty as prestigious as Cambridge’s, a university ranked as number two in the world after Oxford, would accept this humiliation is proof that whites in countries that still have white majorities are now second class citizens. One wonders what follows after this. Will white professors next be sent to re-education centers? Will they be deported like Jews in Nationalist Socialist Germany? What will happen to white people who are continually demonized in universities and the media and by Democrats?
These questions are not entirely rhetorical. In 2017 the Huffington Post allowed a feminist, or a parody of one, to raise the question of denying white men the vote:
“If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were (sic) one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.” (The article, “Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise,” by Shelley Garland was published on April 13, 2017. The article has since been taken down as the author’s identity could not be confirmed.)
Beloit College Dean Lisa Anderson-Levy declared that “whiteness poses an existential threat to social, political and economic life in the US.” Texas State University student Rudy Martinez wrote that “white death will mean liberation for all.” Georgetown University professor Christine Fair was so incensed by Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Surpeme Curt that she wrote that the Senate Judiciary Committee, a “chorus of entitled white men . . . deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps.”
Any white student, dean or professor who made such statements about blacks and women would be dismissed and made unemployable. Yet women and racial “minorities” are free to make insulting, hostile, and divisive statements about white men without fear of being accused of hate speech or insensitivity.
How can a party that has delegitimized white people expect to lead them?
America is a country fragmented by inculcated race and gender hostilities. The obvious divisiveness is not a recommendation for multiculturalism.