Australia Got Hooked on The US

The country has established a Cyber Command and is strengthening cooperation with Washington.

Australia holds a special place in global geopolitics. Despite the size of the country, it has never actively participated in shaping global political processes, acting as an appendage of the United Kingdom and then the United States. Now, in the context of the changing global balance of power and the growing confrontation between the United States and China, Australia is becoming a distant backyard of Washington, which will be used by the Pentagon as a strategic stronghold in the Pacific region.

On August 9, it was announced that the country had established a Cyber Command.

Joint Cyber Unit, Fleet Cyber Unit, 138 Signal Squadron, 462 Squadron and the 1st Joint Public Affairs Unit have all now moved into Cyber Forces Group. The creation of a Joint Data Network Unit, from its previous operational support task role, is planned for the future.

Cyber Command sits alongside Cyberspace Operations Division, Joint Capabilities Division, Strategic Military Effects Branch and ADF personnel employed within the Australian Signals Directorate. Cyber domain comprises cyberspace and the electromagnetic spectrum. Cognitive and information warfare, which correlate with the work of the new Cyber Command, is about having capabilities and delivering effects within the information environment, which encompasses all five domains – alongside the cyber domain, it is maritime, land, air and space in the application of military power.

Something similar, but much earlier,  practiced the US military.

The establishment of the Australian Cyber Command was preceded by the Blue Spectrum cyber training in July, which took place jointly with the military from the United States and Japan. The formal “host” of the exercices was Commander Information Warfare Force Captain Catherine Gordon, and the maneuvers took place under the auspices of the Trilateral Maritime Information Warfare Working Group initiative.

The main task was synchronising defensive cyber tactics, techniques, procedures, workflows and lexicon, through maritime operational technology incident response. According to official statements, these maneuvers were another step to strengthen partnership and inter-operational effectiveness in conducting information warfare operations.

In addition, in early August, it was announced that Australia was launching the Defense Digital Engineering Strategy to accelerate processes to reorganize data capabilities and management tools.

It is important to note that digital transformation programs are implemented under the auspices of the US Department of Defense, and not Australia, which once again indicates that Canberra has become not just a junior partner of Washington, but is actually managed by it in its geopolitical interests. And the establishment of the Australian Cyber Command was carried out with the direct assistance of the Pentagon.

Australian Defense Minister Richard Donald Marles confirmed the current concordat with the United States at the latest ministerial consultations, which took place in early August in Washington.

He noted that in addition to the activity on the AUKUS line and the order of Virginia–class nuclear submarines from the United States, joint production of the Precision Guided Strike missiles, known as PrSM, will be organized and other bilateral initiatives will be launched, including the long-term deployment of the US military in Australia in new locations (that is, the expansion of the network of US military bases).

At the same time, in an interview, when asked about “the threat of Chinese aggression as an acute issue for your government. What is your sense of the biggest risk there?,“ Marles avoided a direct answer, saying that “ we’ve sought to stabilize the relationship with China and we’ve had some success in that. Part of that, a key part of that, from a security point of view has been around resuming the defense dialogue. It’s not going to resolve the fundamental issues between our two countries, but hopefully it does mean that we better understand each other’s behaviors and our military point of view.“

Obviously, we are talking about the point of view not only of Australia, but also of its older Anglo-Saxon brother in AUKUS and the Five Eyes coalition (FVEY), and the US position on China is quite clear – it is to stop the growth of China‘s power and limit its cooperation in all directions. In addition to various sanctions restrictions and an increased military presence in the immediate vicinity of China, Washington is working on new ones.

For example, in the United States, military experts note that “the United States must adapt and retool its strategies and institutions to confront the challenge, adopting a philosophy of risk-based prioritization across the board. Leaders should prioritize limiting economic entanglement with China in areas that touch critical infrastructure, national resilience, and warfighting capabilities, recognizing the evolving nature of China’s strategic approach to these sectors. Second, there are areas where U.S. security and economic goals are misaligned. To drive alignment, the White House could appoint an economic security czar to lead the development of a national economic security strategy to set strategic objectives and coordinate the use of tools such as export controls and sanctions. The czar could also lead efforts to deepen collaboration with allies and partners to develop shared threat assessments and strategies for research, development, and investment in strategic technologies. Third, the United States and other democracies must address the critical gap in research security concerning the transfer of knowledge in fundamental research, which current policies focused on technology transfer often overlook. This oversight is particularly dangerous in the context of military-civil fusion, where seemingly benign scientific collaborations can contribute to China’s military capabilities. Partnerships and information exchanges among government, industry, and academia will be essential to addressing research security gaps.”

That is why Washington reacts extremely negatively to any Chinese activity, whether it is Beijing’s new trade agreements with any country or its success in shipbuilding.

And Australia seems to be playing an increasingly important role in deterring China, providing its assets and territory to the United States and following further instructions from the White House and the Pentagon.

Australia Got Hooked on The US