Why did China, Russia, and Europe lose the most from the US attack on Venezuela and Maduro’s abduction?

What are the three reasons for its disgraceful and cooperative silence? Which eight nations stand to be invaded, humiliated, and have their wealth plundered?

The shock of the U.S. air and naval invasion of Venezuela remains fresh, and the turmoil and chaos it unleashed has profoundly affected international security. As a result, making firm conclusions about present events and the future may not be prudent. Nonetheless, the first reading of the world’s responses to this invasion and the abduction of the head of state and his spouse from their bedroom (Maduro), particularly by the three major world powers—China, Russia, and Europe—has been extremely illuminating.

When Donald Trump and his main mentor Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan was successful in using the “shock and awe” theory on Venezuelan soil to achieve its goals without any real, strong, and prompt reaction from the three powers, aside from condemnation, denunciation, and complaints to the Security Council, this scandalous position—especially by the two superpowers China and Russia—first confirms that their reading was closer to reality. This will undoubtedly motivate Trump to keep violating national sovereignty, undermining what is left of international law, and placing the occupation and resource looting of more targeted nations at the top of his impending attack agenda.

Trump was borrowing Netanyahu’s theory, currently being implemented in the Middle East, when he literally threatened to alter the global influence map through military force, economic pressure, expansionist plans, and the looting of natural resources, starting with oil and gas and ending with gold and precious metals.

Given that all of the American signs and actions were laying the groundwork for the American assault, there are three possible explanations for the “lame” Chinese-Russian response in terms of failing to act quickly to halt it and foil it even before it starts:

First, Trump may have made a “deal” with the leaders of China and Russia in private talks. The main idea of the deal was that Taiwan would be left to China and Ukraine to Russia, allowing both countries to condemn and denounce the actions as much as they wanted.

The second strategy is that, as part of previous agreements, the two nations might have remained silent about American preparations for the invasion and the use of military force in Venezuela, aiming to trap Trump, damage America’s reputation, expose American falsehoods about democracy, the free world, and human rights, and mobilise the international community against the United States.

The third strategy involves remaining a spectator, refraining from direct military conflict with the Trump administration, and offering Venezuela as a sacrifice to the American-Israeli duo, as demonstrated in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, and Yemen.

They can be grouped in a list of eight nations to address the question that is being pressed regarding who the next victim or victims of President Trump’s current craze are:

Venezuela, a country rich in oil, gold, and minerals, is facing punishment for its president’s challenge to Emperor Trump and departure from the American alliance.

The president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, stood in the trench alongside the Gaza warriors against the war of famine, ethnic cleansing, and extermination, challenging the US government and its partner, Netanyahu, when he cut ties with Israel.

Cuba, the ancient country that, despite poverty and a blockade, has resisted American influence for decades.

4. Mexico, with its obstinate government that borders the United States, endangers its population through waves of immigration while also denouncing genocide.

5. The fifth is Denmark’s strategically located island of Greenland, which is rich in natural resources, including minerals.

The Israeli-occupied state faces an existential threat from Iran, a powerful Middle Eastern nation with nuclear programmes and missile systems that have undermined its military might, security, and stability. The Israeli and American invasions have also failed to overthrow the government.

In Nigeria, an African oil state, Trump—who has been involved in the rape of children and the company of prostitutes—abruptly transformed himself into a priest or perhaps a pope, all under the premise of assaulting Christians.
President Trump promised to invade Canada, making it the 51st state in the union.

The silence of its leadership and members regarding this American aggression on Venezuela has undoubtedly dealt a near-fatal blow to the “BRICS” system, which China and Russia envisioned as an economic and military power parallel to NATO, aimed at ending the dominance of the dollar and the American financial system. Until this system regains its credibility and demonstrates its commitment to its charter and readiness for confrontation, who will trust it and look forward to its protection, sovereignty, and prosperity in the near and distant future?

If all three powers—China, Russia, and Europe—react the same regrettable way, Trump will be encouraged to move forward with his plans to conquer and colonise the nations on his list. We suggest forming a new, extended, worldwide, popular and governmental alliance that includes all three powers to combat Trump and put an end to his haughtiness, aggression, and threats, which have only been matched by Hitler and Netanyahu.

We wish to sum up by stating that America is not “immune” to a significant and resounding loss and by mentioning “small” nations whose citizens have strong wills and respectable national leadership. We can only name two nations—Iraq and Afghanistan—but we can also name a third that degraded Trump: North Korea, which has a potent nuclear weapon backed by intercontinental ballistic missiles, and Trump is afraid to do anything but bend down to its leader.

Netanyahu involved Trump in this conflict to exact revenge on the Latin American nations that flew the Palestinian flag and to save Israel from the losses and devastation it suffered due to the genocide war in Gaza. The withdrawal from the World Cup tournament next summer on American land undoubtedly marks the first step towards unifying the world’s peoples against the new American-Israeli colonialism.

Why did China, Russia, and Europe lose the most from the US attack on Venezuela and Maduro’s abduction?

2 thoughts on “Why did China, Russia, and Europe lose the most from the US attack on Venezuela and Maduro’s abduction?

  • pdo

    Why are they no Chinese troops in South America? There are US troops all around china.
    Why are they no Russian troops in South America? There are US troops all around Russia.

    We can understand that Russia is busy enough to fight the US, NATO and EU, UK midgets but China with its million men army and its economy does not have the means to protect countries like Venezuela?

    Real challengers to the US would definitely take every opportunity to do to the US what the US do to them.

    And a real contender would give itself the means to reach every corner of the planet to do so.

    But China and Russia are more about talks than anything else. Useless complaints at the UN (a corrupt controlled organization) only make the empire laugh.

    Or is that all staged and planned that way?

    Like the ‘capture’ of Maduro, in his own house… He’ s been betrayed and those in power today have dame a deal with the devil, as zionist bitch Trump is bragging about, they will send oil to the US so that ‘israel’ can attack Iran without too much risk for the US to lack of oil in case the Ormuz Strait is closed.

    Reply
    • Bashar

      pedo is right, Iran was stupid to never get nuclear weapons or was it made on purpose by a corrupt Iranian elite serving its very enemies over its people?

      This article seems to convey this theory:

      Did Moscow Betray Maduro?
      https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/did-moscow-betray-maduro

      Meanwhile, the Iranians, who are liars when it comes to discussing Iran and the Middle East, but suddenly clear-eyed and perceptive when it comes to realizing that the Kremlin is an ally of Israel, are pointing out that this was a coup. Here:

      TEHRAN, Jan. 04 (MNA) – Was Nicolás Maduro arrested in a US military operation or quietly ushered out through a negotiated deal? Conflicting reports and opposition doubts are challenging Washington’s narrative.
      Maduro arrest puzzle: Military operation or negotiated exit?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *