The day after coronavirus: Humanity deserves an end to neoliberalism

There will never be a better opportunity to radically rethink the current economic and social model

The Renaissance blossomed in Europe roughly five centuries ago. Priot to that, the continent had gone through the Middle Ages and been afflicted by the Black Death, which decimated its population. Today, the coronavirus pandemic may be history’s way of offering something approaching a replica.

It is too early to say how this replica will unfold, but it is important to start thinking about the day after the coronavirus crisis hopefully ends.

Although many pundits say the world and globalisation will not be the same, now is the the time to shape this outcome, to avoid what the Sicilian Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa warned against in his classic novel, The Leopard: “Everything needs to change, so everything can stay the same.”

The essence of leadership

This pandemic is providing many lessons. One of those is about the essence of leadership. It consists not only of inspiring and reassuring others. It is not limited to effectively dealing with emergencies. It is also, crucially, about foreseeing future outcomes and planning accordingly, with the right lessons learned from past mistakes.

Another virus threatens our societies: cognitive failure and the decline of historical memory. If in 2003, after the SARS epidemic, the leading countries in pharmaceutical research had devoted time and resources to developing a vaccine, today perhaps it would have been available and effective against the current coronavirus. Yet, at the time, the small number of infections and probably the predicted limited earnings did not stimulate such an effort; today, we understand how fatal that omission was.

World leaders are so consumed by their compulsive obsession with the present that they do not reflect sufficiently on the past or future. The priority now is not only to revive the economy, but above all, to change how the economy and society have been managed.

Dramatic and unexpected events must be prevented and controlled, so they do not have the capacity to overwhelm us.

The post-coronavirus period will be shaped by how some major challenges are dealt with. In reaffirming certain prerogatives of nation-states over wild and limitless globalisation, it will be important to avoid falling into crude and petty nationalism, where the step towards authoritarianism is often short (as in Viktor Orban’s Hungary).

Missed opportunities

In tempering globalization, cooperation between states and international institutions should be preserved, as they remain essential tools for overcoming any emergency. Considering how much globalization has blessed the web giants – including Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google – with huge profits, the time has come for them to become normal taxpayers.

For the world economy to be saved, additional resources must be leveraged, different wealth taxes levied, and tax havens eradicated, with the same determination used against terrorism.

As fossil fuel prices dip, there will never be a better moment to divert investments towards renewable energy supplies.

People queue in a street of Tegucigalpa on 6 April (AFP)
People queue in a street of Tegucigalpa on 6 April (AFP)

For some actors, it will be crucial not to miss opportunities again. In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the European Union failed to live up to its widely claimed values of solidarity and cooperation; a repeat of this during the much more serious coronavirus crisis could mark the end of the union.

The revival of the economy cannot follow the post-2008 model. Different criteria must be applied for measures with a bigger outreach. Hundreds of millions of people were left behind by austerity measures, while the broken and corrupt financial system was bailed out.

It is not possible to expect in 2020 the same tolerance and resignation towards the distortions and inequities of the previous decade’s economic measures.

In such a context, finance must finally return to its origins: a tool at the service of the economy, ending the perverse opposite sequence followed for the past four decades. Neoliberalism must end. The economic system should move from the current model, which has created a small number of stratospheric riches, to one that will ensure a stratospheric number of dignified existences.

Rejecting neoliberalism

Finally, the current concepts of threat and security must be reviewed. Decades of warnings over Russian, Chinese and Iranian threats now sound less convincing, even if the virus did originate in China.

Hundreds of billions of dollars spent annually by the US on weapons, alongside hundreds of US military bases around the world, have proved useless in preventing the biggest threat facing the country since the Second World War.

The revival of the economy cannot follow the post-2008 model. Different criteria must be applied for measures with a bigger outreach. Hundreds of millions of people were left behind by austerity measures, while the broken and corrupt financial system was bailed out.

It is not possible to expect in 2020 the same tolerance and resignation towards the distortions and inequities of the previous decade’s economic measures.

In such a context, finance must finally return to its origins: a tool at the service of the economy, ending the perverse opposite sequence followed for the past four decades. Neoliberalism must end. The economic system should move from the current model, which has created a small number of stratospheric riches, to one that will ensure a stratospheric number of dignified existences.

Rejecting neoliberalism

Finally, the current concepts of threat and security must be reviewed. Decades of warnings over Russian, Chinese and Iranian threats now sound less convincing, even if the virus did originate in China.

Hundreds of billions of dollars spent annually by the US on weapons, alongside hundreds of US military bases around the world, have proved useless in preventing the biggest threat facing the country since the Second World War.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/day-after-coronavirus-humanity-deserves-end-neoliberalism

One thought on “The day after coronavirus: Humanity deserves an end to neoliberalism

  • Richard Ong

    Neoliberalism is a concept that came out of nowhere to describe nothing. Neo- this and neo- that. Flabby thinking and pure wind.

    You can call the current corrupt arrogant, monopoly, vicious plutocracy what you want so “neo-liberalism” is as a good as anything. Just remember your terms is describing a diseased transformation/distortion of a viable, productive, useful system, namely, plain vanilla capitalism and free markets with necessary regulation (e.g., enforcement of contracts, no monopoly, no fraud).

    No citizen or thinker in his right mind said lets have the 1% own most of the wealth and decide elections between just a few people. That was a corruption, a tragedy. What you hope will replace this abberant situation is all airy fairy and completely unexamined. The mystery solution. Just so it sounds good, right?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *